Trump Iran Deal Wp


U.S. and Iran work toward deal to extend ceasefire and reopen Strait of Hormuz

Oil prices fell and global stocks rose over optimism for an agreement, but President Trump emphasized that a deal "isn't even fully negotiated yet."


May 25, 2026 at 7:42 a.m. EDTToday at 7:42 a.m. 

The Strait of Hormuz off Bandar Abbas, Iran, last week. (Majid-Asgaripour/Reuters)

By Sammy Westfall, Natalie Allison, John Hudson and Susannah George

The United States and Iran have developed a “framework” that extends their ceasefire 60 days as the two sides reach a “final deal” to end the war in Iran, while in the meantime, the Strait of Hormuz would be de-mined and reopened, a senior administration official said.



Get concise answers to your questions. Try Ask The Post AI.

The official, however, said no agreement with Iran had been signed. It remains unclear how binding the framework is. A diplomat familiar with the matter said the latest proposal is awaiting Iran’s approval. The official and diplomat spoke on the condition of anonymity to publicly discuss ongoing negotiations.



Speaking to reporters Monday morning in New Delhi, Secretary of State Marco Rubio signaled cautious optimism for the deal, saying negotiators have “what I think is a pretty solid thing on the table in terms of their ability to open up the straits, get the straits open, enter into a very real, significant, time-limited negotiation on the nuclear matter, and hopefully we can pull it off.” He did not elaborate on the terms.


Markets echoed that optimism Monday, with the price of Brent crude oil down nearly 6 percent to about $97 a barrel and Asian stocks up for the day. U.S. markets are closed for Memorial Day.


President Donald Trump, meanwhile, responded to early criticism from Democrats and some fellow Republicans, saying in a post Monday morning on Truth Social that such people “know nothing about the potential deal I am making with Iran, things that haven’t even been negotiated yet.”


“The deal with Iran will either be a great and meaningful one, or there will be no deal,” he said.


Upon signing the memorandum of understanding, Iran would immediately reopen the Strait of Hormuz and take steps to ensure traffic returns to prewar conditions within 30 days, the proposal stipulates, according to the diplomat. Iran, the U.S. and allies would also immediately end military operations on every front, including Lebanon.


The diplomat said the proposal includes Iran reaffirming that it will never develop nuclear weapons and agreeing that its stockpile of enriched material will be disposed of under an agreed-upon method.

Ask The Post AI

Dive deeper


The memorandum of understanding “commits” the Iranians to not having a nuclear weapon, including “giving up the nuclear dust,” the senior U.S. administration official said, a reference to the country’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Over the next two months, the two sides will discuss “the mechanism” for doing so, added the official.


But questions remain about how quickly aspects of the framework would be implemented.


Trump’s Monday comments echoed a post on Sunday evening that the deal “isn’t even fully negotiated yet” and “nobody has seen it, or knows what it is.”

Ask The Post AI

Dive deeper


“So don’t listen to the losers, who are critical about something they know nothing about,” the president wrote, adding that he doesn’t “make bad deals!!”


Earlier in the day, Trump wrote that “negotiations are proceeding in an orderly and constructive manner.” He told his representatives “not to rush into a deal in that time is on our side,” he wrote.


“Both sides must take their time and get it right. There can be no mistakes!” he wrote, adding that the U.S.-Iran relationship is becoming “more professional and productive.” He said that Iran must understand that it cannot develop or procure a nuclear bomb.


An Iranian official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the opening of the Strait will be phased. In the first phase the U.S. will release $12 billion in frozen Iranian assets, minesweeping in the strait will begin, and the U.S. blockade will lift, the Iranian official said.


The Iranian official said the memorandum of understanding does not include a nuclear agreement, just a pledge to negotiate the nuclear issue later. He said an announcement with further details could come Monday.


It’s unclear when the strait is expected to be back in use, although the senior administration official touted the new framework as a means of bringing “relief to American families at the pump.” The official said the U.S. blockade will be “loosened proportionately” as the strait opens, describing the arrangement as “‘trust but verify’ on steroids.”


And Iran’s frozen assets won’t be released until it begins giving up its highly enriched uranium, with the official adding that Iran “gets nothing until they deliver.” The diplomat said frozen assets and sanctions will be dealt with based on Iran’s compliance with the proposal’s other points.

Ask The Post AI

Dive deeper


The new framework ensures both sides — the U.S. and its allies and Iran and its proxies — “cease fighting in the region,” the official added, while guaranteeing Israel’s right to “act against imminent threats.”


Speaking Monday, Rubio confirmed that understanding with regard to Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon. “Israel always has a right to protect itself. Every country in the world does. And so, if Hezbollah is going to launch missiles at them, Israel has every right to respond to that or to prevent that from happening. That’s always been understood. It’s being understood during the ceasefire.”


What readers are saying


The comments express strong criticism of President Donald Trump's handling of the conflict with Iran, highlighting perceived failures and inconsistencies in his approach. Many commenters compare the current situation unfavorably to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)... Show more

This summary is AI-generated. AI can make mistakes and this summary is not a replacement for reading the comments.


Comments 1,811

Related Articles

Iran, U.S. resume nuclear negotiations as Trump’s war clock ticks down

February 26, 2026


U.S., Iran complete round of talks as Trump weighs diplomacy against strikes

February 26, 2026


U.S. and Iran hold nuclear talks amid threats of regional war

February 6, 2026


View 3 more storiesView 3 more stories

Newsletter

As news breaks


World News Alerts

Breaking news email alerts for major happenings around the world.

Sign up


Company

Chevron Icon


Sections

Chevron Icon


Get The Post

Chevron Icon


Contact Us

Chevron Icon

About The Post

Policies & Standards

Digital Products Terms of Sale

Print Products Terms of Sale

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Cookie Settings

Submissions & Discussion Policy

RSS Terms of Service

Sitemap

Ad Choices

washingtonpost.com

© 1996-2026 The Washington Post


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

115 Years of War Since 1900 for America

Since 1900, the United States has been at war or engaged in major military conflicts for roughly 100 to 115 years. A few nations have participated in more conflicts, but that does not diminish the extraordinary amount of resources the United States has devoted to warfare over this period. These estimates come from reliable sources, including the Library of Congress and other authoritative conflict records. Some of these wars can be argued as justified. In my view, World War II, the Gulf War, and the war in Afghanistan had legitimate grounds to some degree. Yet many other conflicts might have been resolved peacefully—or avoided entirely—had different choices been made. This does not mean the United States, or any nation, should retreat into isolationism. Global problems require global participation. When a nation removes itself from the table, it leaves space for authoritarian actors or non‑state armed groups to step in and shape outcomes. Beyond material costs, many sources estim...
Read more

Trouble with the Two Party System and Solution

Some time ago, I shared my belief on social media that the United States Constitution itself is not the problem; rather, it is the individuals who create and enforce laws who are misusing their power. However, a law professor challenged this view, arguing that there are indeed issues within the Constitution itself. He pointed out that the current political climate in the United States, particularly the actions of the President and his party, illustrates these constitutional shortcomings. When voters enter the polling booth, their choices are typically limited to two major parties. The dominance of these parties makes it difficult for third-party candidates to have a realistic chance of winning, except in some local elections. As a result, voting for a third-party candidate often feels like wasting a vote. This is a reality that many, including myself, have accepted on a personal level. For example, when William Buckley, a prominent conservative commentator many years ago, was asked...
Read more

Grievance with Trump and the Republican Party

The follow is my list of the grievances I have with President Trump and the Republican party.  1. Executive Overreach President Trump has asserted direct control over areas traditionally and constitutionally reserved for Congress. He uses executive orders as de facto legislation, directing agencies to implement the President’s personal agenda and not an agenda that is beneficial for the country. This expansion of unilateral authority bypasses the legislative process and weakens the separation of powers. 2. Failure of Congressional Oversight Congress has not exercised adequate oversight of the executive branch, enabling expansions of presidential authority in emergency powers, tariffs, immigration, and the use of acting officials. This neglect weakens the rule of law and undermines democratic accountability. 3. Misuse of National Emergency Powers The President has declared national emergencies without legitimate justification, using them to bolster executive orders rathe...
Read more